On the occasion of 100 days of Human Fukushima incident and 100 years of nuclear science, Professor Pham Duy Hien, an expert in nuclear science, has a letter to Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan. The following is the full text of the letter:
Your Excellency Prime Minister Naoto Kan,
Round 100 years ago, human beings for the first time did see tiny structure deep inside matter called atomic nuclei. Thirty years later, a nuclear reactor was invented to demonstrate that great energy in these tiny structures can be exploited and conquered. But in less than four years afterwards, the fruits of labor and hard work done by hundreds of scientists involved in the Manhattan Project, which were two atomic bombs, were dropped by the U.S. Army on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in an attempt not to force Japan to surrender, but to show destructive power of their nuclear weapons even after the war. The many talented scientists who conceived the two bombs were too powerless to stop the government from causing disasters to Japan.
Since then, people everywhere in the world have associated atomic energy with the atomic bombs which once caused tragic misfortune to humans, which is unfair!
Your Excellency Prime Minister Naoto Kan,
Round 100 years ago, human beings for the first time did see tiny structure deep inside matter called atomic nuclei. Thirty years later, a nuclear reactor was invented to demonstrate that great energy in these tiny structures can be exploited and conquered. But in less than four years afterwards, the fruits of labor and hard work done by hundreds of scientists involved in the Manhattan Project, which were two atomic bombs, were dropped by the U.S. Army on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in an attempt not to force Japan to surrender, but to show destructive power of their nuclear weapons even after the war. The many talented scientists who conceived the two bombs were too powerless to stop the government from causing disasters to Japan.
Since then, people everywhere in the world have associated atomic energy with the atomic bombs which once caused tragic misfortune to humans, which is unfair!
Nuclear power (NP) appeared in fifty decades after the war well cleared itself of this injustice. A positive atmosphere overwhelmed everyone so that very few scientists at that time (including the writer of this letter) thought that one day nuclear power would again bring misfortunes to humans. But it was our habitual subjectivism overconfidence that led to the accident at the Three Mile Island, and a more serious one in Tchernobyl. Nuclear power has to decline before it reaches its heydays. For more than three decades, the USA did not build a single nuclear power plant.
In this context I am very impressed by the Japanese. Despite your tragic sufferings from the two atomic bombs, and despite the fact that the seismic belt is so close to the east coast, most Japanese people are willing to take risks from nuclear power to ensure energy security for the country’s economic. A greatest and most expensive science and technology program of nuclear power has been deployed for several decades. I think the Japanese people accept nuclear power not because they believe everything is perfectly safe as poers groups often boast about. But above all, they believe in the power of Japan’s advanced technology which can minimize the risk of incidents, and if they do occur, their harmful effects will be minimized.
This is their faith in Japan’s experts in nuclear science, who are successors of Japanese tradition, starting with H. Yukawa and Y. Nishina, two scientists who left their great invention of nuclear physics even before the World War II. The next generations have been successful, too, and Japan now has a powerful nuclear human resource, working in its world-leading research centers, institutes and laboratories.
But - Dear Prime Minister - again a nuclear disaster found its way to the Japanese. One hour after the earthquake and tsunami which devastated the Northeast, when hearing power failure from Fukushima plant, you exclaimed: "Here is the real danger." Early the next day, you flew to the site, entered the bunker with radiation-resistant concrete walls and urged TEPCO to carry out the best measures to cope with the accidents. During the days after that, you always appeared on TV, looking tired by the burdens set on your shoulders. I saw you bow before Japan’s national flag and before the audience to express your sorrows. Somehow, I read a reflection on your face: Where does it all come from?
But the sorrow is not just yours. Now, one hundred days of Fukushima accident, everything are clear enough for us to draw lessons for the next step of nuclear power development, when nuclear science celebrates its centennial birthday. Harnessing nuclear energy will never be an easy thing to do. The situations in Fukushima would not have been so bad if Japan's nuclear power system had not been immersed in the symphony "Everything’s perfect" played continuously by the country’s power groups. The true voices were considered as out of tune. Talented scientists in Japan were not asked for consultancy concerning disaster prevention and situation. Japanese scientist Y. Yamaguchi has his famous comment "The earthquake and tsunami were the trigger only, Japan itself created conditions for such a catastrophic event to happen." The biggest lesson learned from Fukushima is that human beings, rather than modern machinery, are the decisive factor to ensure nuclear safety.
Now, with so much of negative, suspicious manipulation of interest groups cornering state agencies has been uncovered, resulting in despair that millions of Japanese people are experiencing, the majority of Japanese people have to say no with nuclear power. As people have lost their confidence. And so, recently in France, you announced to suspend the program to build dozens of new reactors, instead, renewable energy development has been started. Once Japan is committed to promoting renewable energy, it will be a remarkable milestone for the world. I am waiting to see whether this will be a consistent official energy policy of Japan’s government in the future?
Dear Prime Minister,
Fukushima disaster occurred at a time when Vietnam had just launched nuclear power projects. This projects were already in the agenda when you traveled to Vietnam late last year. This massive project was consulted by the Japanese energy groups and encouraged by them during the past ten years. They have been also very generous in inviting many Vietnamese people to visit nuclear power plants in Japan to import the same symphony “Everything’s perfect” into our country. But our country lacks people who master nuclear power technology to launch such an ambitious program to construct dozens of reactors from 2020 to 2030?
So I think it is better to delay the projects over ten years so that Japan can have time to help Vietnam in training and forming teams of proficient professionals, and promoting projects on renewable energy, soon stopping wasteful and inefficient use of energy as it is now. Vietnam lacks electricity, but the contents of this cooperation will help solve the shortage of electricity more efficiently. It is not necessary to rush to nuclear power which may worry people after all that they saw from Fukushima over the past days.
I look forward to your consideration.
I wish you good health.
Sincerely yours.
Pham Duy Hien, Prof. of Nuclear Science
Người dịch: Hoàng Lan
___________________________________
*Xin cảm ơn dịch giả Hoàng Lan đã tặng chúng ta bản dịch bức thư quan trọng của Giáo sư Phạm Duy Hiển gửi Thủ tưởng Naoto Kan.
*Chúng tôi cũng chờ bản hiệu đính của bác Đ.H.L.
*Ảnh chân dung Giáo sư Phạm Duy Hiển là của Báo Tuổi trẻ Online.
Thư của Giáo sư Phạm Duy Hiển:
Dear Anh Xuân Diện,
Cảm ơn Anh đã post thư ngỏ của tôi để có một lượng độc giả rất cao và nhiều comments thú vị. Cho tôi gửi lời cảm ơn chân thành đến độc giả Ngô Đức Thọ, và một lần nữa xin chia xẻ những gì độc giả này đã viết ra.
Đặc biệt, xin cảm ơn Hoàng Lan đã có một bản dịch tiếng Anh công phu và chính xác. Nếu được, Anh Diện có thể thay mặt tôi và dịch giả HL liên hệ với Vietnam News để đăng toàn văn hay tóm tắt cũng tốt. Hiện nay đã có bản dịch ra tiếng Nhật và được biết bản dịch sẽ (hoặc đã) gửi cho TT Kan.
Một lần nữa xin cảm ơn mọi người.
Cảm ơn Anh đã post thư ngỏ của tôi để có một lượng độc giả rất cao và nhiều comments thú vị. Cho tôi gửi lời cảm ơn chân thành đến độc giả Ngô Đức Thọ, và một lần nữa xin chia xẻ những gì độc giả này đã viết ra.
Đặc biệt, xin cảm ơn Hoàng Lan đã có một bản dịch tiếng Anh công phu và chính xác. Nếu được, Anh Diện có thể thay mặt tôi và dịch giả HL liên hệ với Vietnam News để đăng toàn văn hay tóm tắt cũng tốt. Hiện nay đã có bản dịch ra tiếng Nhật và được biết bản dịch sẽ (hoặc đã) gửi cho TT Kan.
Một lần nữa xin cảm ơn mọi người.
P D Hiển
(translater: hoàng lan)
13h, ngày 24.6.2011:
Dưới đây, xin giới thiệu bản hiệu đính của Đ.H.L cho bản dịch của Hoàng Lan
An Open Letter From Frof. Pham Duy Hien to Prime Minister Naoto Kan
Your Excellency Prime Minister Naoto Kan,
One hundred years ago, mankind for the first time saw tiny structure deep inside matter called atomic nucleus. Thirty years later, a nuclear reactor was invented to demonstrate that immense energy in these tiny structures could be confined and exploited. But in less than four years later, as a result of hard works done by hundreds of scientists involved in the Manhattan Project, the U.S. military dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki not to force Japan’s surrender but to show the post war destructive power of their nuclear weapons. The talented scientists who conceived the two bombs were powerless to stop the government from causing disasters to Japan.
Since then, people around the world have associated atomic energy with the atomic bombs which once caused tragic and miserable destruction to mankind. How unfortunate!
After the war, Nuclear power (NP) appeared in the 50’s vindicated itself of this misconception. A positive atmosphere overwhelmed scientists at that time (including the writer of this letter), only few thought that one day nuclear power would again bring sufferings to mankind. It was our subjective thinking and overconfidence that led to the accident at the Three Mile Island, and a more serious one in Tchernobyl. Nuclear power was in decline before reaching its peak. For more than three decades, the U.S. had not build a single nuclear power plant.
In this context, I am very impressed with the Japanese people. Despite your tragic sufferings from the two atomic bombs and despite the seismic belt close to the east coast, most Japanese people are willing to risk nuclear power in order to secure energy for the country’s economic growth. A comprehensive and expensive program to develope nuclear power technology has been deployed for several decades. I think the Japanese people accepted nuclear power not because they believed everything is perfectly safe as the power industry groups often boast about. But above all, they believed Japan’s advanced technology could limit the risk; and if, accidents do occur, their harmful effects will be minimized.
They have faith in Japan’s nuclear technology and experts from great Japanese legacy starting with H. Yukawa and Y. Nishina, who left their great inventions of nuclear physics even before the World War II. The next generations have been successful, too. Japan always has a great nuclear resources and experts working in world-leading research institutes.
But, Dear Prime Minister, nuclear disaster again found its way to the Japanese. One hour after the earthquake and the tsunami devastated northeast Japan, when hearing power failure from Fukushima plant, you exclaimed: "Here is the real danger." Early next day, you flew to the site, entering the radiation-proof bunker, to urge TEPCO to carry out the best measures to cope with the accidents. During the following days on TV, you looked tired by the national burdens set on your shoulders. I saw you bowed before Japan’s national flag and people to express your sorrows. Somehow, I read a reflection on your face: Where does it all come from?
But the sorrow is not just yours. Now, one hundred days of Fukushima accident, things are clear enough for us to draw lessons for the next step of nuclear power development, when nuclear science celebrates its centennial birthday. Harnessing nuclear energy will never be an easy thing to do. The situations in Fukushima would not have been so bad if Japan's nuclear power system had not been immersed in the symphony "Everything’s perfect" orchestrated by the country’s power groups. The true voices were considered as out of tune. Talented scientists in Japan were not consulted in disaster preventions and solutions. Japanese scientist Y. Yamaguchi has his famous comment: "The earthquake and tsunami were only the triggers, Japan itself created conditions for such a catastrophic event to happen." The biggest lesson learned from Fukushima is that human beings, rather than modern machinery, are the decisive factor to ensure nuclear safety.
Now, with so much of negative, suspicious manipulation of special interest groups cornering state agencies has been uncovered, resulting in despair that millions of Japanese people are experiencing, the majority of Japanese people have to say no with nuclear power. As people have lost their confidence, recently in France, you announced to suspend the program to build dozens of new reactors. Instead, renewable energy development has taken place. Once Japan is committed to promoting renewable energy, it will be a remarkable milestone for the world. I am waiting to see whether this will be a consistent official energy policy of Japan’s government in the future?
Dear Prime Minister,
Fukushima disaster occurred at a time when Vietnam had just launched nuclear power projects. These projects were already in the agenda when you traveled to Vietnam late last year. These massive projects were consulted and advocated by the Japanese energy groups during the past ten years. They have generously inviting many Vietnamese people to visit nuclear power plants in Japan to import the same symphony “Everything’s perfect” into our country. But our country lacks personnel who master nuclear power technology to launch such an ambitious program of constructing dozens of reactors from 2020 to 2030?
Therefore, I think it is better to delay the projects over ten years so that Japan can have time to help Vietnam in training and forming teams of proficient professionals, who will promote renewable energy projects and eliminate current wasteful and inefficient use of energy. Vietnam needs electricity, these kind of cooperations will help solve the shortage of electricity more efficiently. The public has great concern for what they witnessed from Fukushima in recent days. It is unnecessary to rush to nuclear power.
I look forward to your consideration.
I wish you good health.
Sincerely yours.
Pham Duy Hien, Prof. of Nuclear Science

0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét